Is "good enough" usually higher or lower than our self-worth?

The idea that "good enough" is usually lower than our self-worth reflects a common psychological understanding of how individuals perceive themselves in relation to their achievements and standards. Typically, self-worth is based on a broader, often more inflated view of one's value as a person, which can exceed reasonable expectations of performance or accomplishments.

When we say that "good enough" is lower than our self-worth, it suggests that individuals often hold themselves to extremely high standards that may not be achievable or realistic. These high standards can lead to feelings of inadequacy when these expectations are not met, even when one may perform satisfactorily by external standards. Therefore, many people may align their notion of self-worth with perfectionism or idealized abilities, making their self-worth seem greater than what is realistically considered "good enough."

This understanding helps in promoting a healthier perspective where individuals can recognize that being "good enough" can often satisfy personal and social criteria without devaluing their inherent self-worth. It encourages people to acknowledge and appreciate their accomplishments, even when they fall short of their idealized standards.