Which statement best describes "have-to" motivations?

The essence of "have-to" motivations is rooted in external pressures or consequences that compel an individual to act. These motivations are often linked to obligations, responsibilities, or the avoidance of negative outcomes. For instance, a person may choose to work overtime not out of desire, but due to the fear of losing their job or facing disciplinary action. This motivation contrasts with intrinsic motivations, which are based on personal enjoyment and satisfaction.

In the context of the other options, personal enjoyment typically aligns with intrinsic motivations rather than "have-to" motivations. Complete autonomy suggests a freedom of choice that would not apply to the "have-to" category, where actions are often dictated by external forces rather than individual desires. Lastly, "have-to" motivations may not be long-lasting, as they can often lead to burnout or resentment when individuals feel they are compelled to do something without genuine interest. Thus, the defining characteristic of "have-to" motivations is more accurately described by the fear of consequences, driving the behavior out of necessity rather than choice or enjoyment.